As I look at
teachers I work with and have worked with, I see an emphasis on instruction
being at the forefront of their lesson planning. From the outside looking in,
the emphasis might look like it is state standardized test, but if you talk to
the teachers and truly find out what their emphasis is you will find that it is
all about students learning and instruction.
Teaching at
its essence is about instruction and learning. Teachers that are trying to do
their best look at a lesson as a chance to present their material in a way that
will grab the students' attention, then will lead into the student learning or
achieving the learner goal. This is not much different than most Instructional
Design Models.
Teachers come
up with their objectives, which is the first step in almost all Instructional
Design Models. Once they have their objectives the work on creating a lesson
that will cater to the students needs to achieve the goal, this would be
similar to Instructional Analysis. The nature of teaching also leads itself to
the constant reflection and adjustment of the plan through formative assessment;
this is very much a part of Morrison, Ross and Kemp's model of instructional
design which is a popular Instructional Design Model. The last part of any
lesson is an assessment or evaluation of what the students have learned, which is
the same of any good Instructional Design Model.
As we look at
whether teachers have been trained in Instructional Design I would have to say
that the nature of their process is the same. I would only say that teachers do
have other factors that come into play when doing their planning. When a
teacher has a great lesson plan or unit plan it will always run into the
classroom atmosphere as a road block. School activities and distractions cause
the teachers to adjust and to think on their feet to change the perfectly
designed lesson to work in the changing atmosphere. This is where we get the
outlook of planning on the fly; it is really just teachers adjusting to the
classroom atmosphere.
So taking a closer look at teaching shows me that Instructional Design is a large part of the profession. The training that teachers go through at the university level helps to prepare them in this practice so that they can achieve success in their own classrooms. I would even say from my personal experience that I was prepared well in Instructional Design. I learned to reflect on my delivery and modes of delivery and was most definitely taught to assess my students to see if what methods I used worked.
I also think that most teachers naturally model instructional design. Any reflective teacher considers the main goals of a lesson or unit before making plans for the classroom, in addition to other actors, like the environment as you mentioned, and individual learning styles.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad that you see an emphasis on good instruction when it comes to lesson planning. I agree that most teachers really do care about student learning and good instruction-the standardized test is just a piece of that. Teachers really do get good at adjusting midstream during instruction, and that's just one reality of teaching. I think I was fairly well prepared in instructional design, too, but I just didn't have that name (instructional design) for the practices I was taught. Reading your blog after I wrote mine made me think about the idea that teachers really are trained in instructional design, but they call it "lesson planning."
ReplyDelete"Lesson planning" does become the focus of teachers. Instructional design seems to be the formal name for professionals. I really do think that as teachers evolve we develop and hone our skills as Instructional Designers "Teachers".
ReplyDelete